2010 is over, 2011 has begun, and Smugglivus is nearly complete! Which means that we must also undergo another very important ritual…
The Airing of Grievances
(in which we air out any dirty laundry from 2010. Warning: plenty of swearing and spoilers ahoy)
In no particular order, these are the things that really pissed us off this year.
1. Overhyped Books
Publishers, there IS such a thing as overhyping your books. When we see one book all over the place on pre-packaged blog tours with guest posts at every single website that will say yes (regardless of whether or not the blog is a suitable fit for a particular book), chain emails every other day, marketing material that promises the book is the Next Twilight or the Next Name of the Wind or is the next big thing (Twilight Meets Gone With the Wind With Zombies IN SPACE!!!!!), it actually causes the opposite reaction to what you are aiming for. We tend to stay away from these overhyped books because they are almost always garbage. Yes, ok, sometimes hype is spot on (for example with The Passage by Justin Cronin, one of Thea’s top 10 this year), but most of the time it creates unreasonable expectations and we have been burned too many times to count.
One perfect example is last year’s Matched by Ally Condie. We saw it everywhere as early as 6 months prior to publication because of its shocking multi-dollar-digit advance, the movie deal, and being touted by newspapers/magazines as the next!best!thing! in Dystopian fiction. Well, it wasn’t. It felt more like a carbon copy of an earlier book (The Giver by Lois Lowry), just with a Love Triangle. Come on now.
2. Posts on How To Blog
We have seen myriad posts about Blogging Rules around the Internets last year and we tried to stay away from the conversation as much as we could – because, frankly, these posts are typically made of…GAAH. List after list of what a blogger should or should not do: how to behave, how to contact who and when, how to get ARCs, how NOT to blog for ARCs, how publishers CARE about what we do, how publishers DO NOT care about what we do, how being concerned about hits is WRONG, how Marketing is EVIL, how doing giveaways and blog tours are akin to skinning one’s cat, how we need to be more critical, how we need to be less critical, how blogging should be FUN, how blogging should be PROFESSIONAL.
Wanna know what we think? You gotta do what you gotta do, dudes. Forget what other people say and do your thing. That’s all.
3. Literary Fiction
The world of Lit Fiction gave us a lot of food for thought last year and not always in a positive way. We are obviously Genre Fiction readers and for better or worse do not read a lot of Literary Fiction. Mostly this is because, well, we tend to think “literature” is rather pointless in its gloominess and navel gazing. But if you think we think lowly of Lit Fic, then wait until you learn what Lit Fic thinks of us, genre readers! Check out this post published in The Guardian.
And Ana actually tried to read some Lit Fic this year, and the result was not pretty. The Finkler Question by Howard Jacobson was shortlisted for Booker Prize and billed as comedy – but in Ana’s opinion, it failed miserably after about 50 pages, comprised mostly of endless lines in which the main character (male) kept describing his woes at not having a good wife to die on him. Seriously.
Then Ana tried again with the older, highly acclaimed Kafka on the Shore by Haruki Murakami which featured talking cats, aliens and whatnot (because you know, that is not Genre Fiction at all), plus Incest and murder and a most annoying tendency not to answer anything, plus endless conversations about music that went nowhere – it was just a mess of gigantic proportions.
But those are nothing compared to:
3.1 Literary Fiction – The Wtfuckery
So, Ana got this book Skippy Dies by Paul Murray because 1) it came highly recommended by several bloggers 2) it was longlisted for the Man Booker Prize 3) it was supposedly, despite its title, a comedy (albeit a “dark” one).
Internets, Ana did not laugh.
It begins with Skippy, this 14 year old boy dying. He is one of several boys who attend a catholic boarding school in Ireland (*inserts the SOUND OF DOOM*).
After the prologue, the story proceeds to follow several characters, including Skippy in the days preceding his death.
In summation: the boy’s mother is dying of cancer, his father won’t talk to him and they pretend she is not dying of cancer, he is sort of bullied at school because he is so small, one of the priests WANTS to sexually abuse him (but won’t because he is still atoning for the other rapes he committed several years ago in Africa) , the only person he trusts is the swimming coach (who after the boy goes to look for him to cry about his mother, drugs him and then proceeds to sexually abuse him while he is asleep). Not that we know that until about 2/3 of the book, but we know that something happened to Skippy.
ARE YOU LAUGHING YET?
Anyways, poor Skippy is falling apart and no one fucking notices – teachers, friends, psychologist – until he takes these pills and dies.
And then the adults at school, even thought they know about the abuse, just go all: oh let’s be all hush-hush and not tell anybody because after all the coach is such A GOOD MAN.
How about NOW??? LAUGUING YET?
Every single adult in this book is a creep or a jerk. The main “hero” learns about the Skippy’s abuse and agrees to shut up about it. Every single kid is either a drug addict, a bully, or plain crazy-psycho. There is this one kid who thinks only about rape and then rapes this girl who allows it because she loves him so much – we spend quite a lot of time inside his head.
IT WAS NOT FUNNY.
Every single female character – adult or child – is portrayed as walking, talking vaginas – the extent of their participation in this novel is how they can use their vaginas to get things.
IN WHAT WORLD DOES THIS CONSTITUTE A COMEDY???????????? Because let us tell you: Ana sobbed like a baby because of what Skippy went through, did not laugh once and actually read the entire book, all 700 pages of it, just to see what would happen hoping that at least someone would be arrested because of what they did to Skippy, but then it just ……ends. NOTHING IS DONE, HIS PARENTS NEVER FIND OUT, ONLY THE TEACHERS KNOW and they do nothing.
And this was not set back in the 60s. This is set in 2010.
NO Internets, IT WAS NOT FUNNY.
4. Movies That Sucked Huge Donkey Balls
4.1. Clash of the Titans – Remake
Aka the Movie that Made Ana Go Apoplectic. A remake of one of our favourite movies of all time (mind you, not because it’s excellent, but because it is so crappy it is actually good)(Thea’s addendum: I think the original was excellent, but because of the Harryhausen special effects, not the story!). But we didn’t go apoplectic because the acting was supremely bad. Or because the visual effects were actually WORSE than the first version’s stop motion ones (the first Medusa was SO much better). No, she hated it because the mythology was WRONG!!! WTF was that all about Zeus being all emo and WOE IS ME MEN DO NOT LOVE ME? WTF was that all about Perseus not hooking up with Andromeda thereby NOT founding Perseid dynasty which is one of the founding myths of the Greeks ?
Learn this Internets: You can not mess with Greek Mythology. It is just plain WRONG. (Unless of course, you do it intelligently, not in such an aggravating manner just for the sake of it).
4.2 Supposed Geekiness That is DECIDEDLY NOT AWESOME; aka Scott Pilgrim sucks huge donkey balls
A disclaimer: this is Thea’s rant (Ana, like most people in the universe, loved Scott Pilgrim).
I think it’s safe to say that both of us are Geeks. Thea LOVES video games, comic books, all manner of speculative fiction, movies, conventions, superheroes, etc. Thea also loves Shaun of the Dead and Hot Fuzz. But Thea was not peeing her pants with excitement when the trailers for Scott Pilgrim vs. the World came out, because it looked kind of…well, tryhard-ish and lame. Isn’t everyone TIRED of Michael Cera yet? Why does slapping on some word graphics and neon visuals set to garage band tracks make everyone go crazy with bliss? Thea simply didn’t get the excitement.
So, Thea refrained from watching Scott Pilgrim in the theater. She waited until it came out on redbox and coughed up the whopping dollar to rent it – only because everyone in the freaking universe, from the supposed target audience of 30-ish geek dudes to firmly NOT-geekish folks loved the film and were praising from here to infinity.
So Thea watched Scott Pilgrim. And, internets, Thea was just as mystified after finishing the movie as she was when the trailers first came out.
Scott Pilgrim is, simply put, disgusting. He’s disgusting in appearance – with that rare shade of pale and his toothpick skinny I-can’t-believe-he-isn’t-collapsing-under-the-weight-of-the-bass-guitar-he-is-supposedly-playing physique, not to mention the annoying fifteen year old pre-pubescent voice and general “oh look at me I’m so pathetic SOMEONE has to find me cute…right?” look. Even worse, he’s disgusting in character (which exacerbates the appearance thing) – he’s a pathetically apathetic, chickenshit, misogynistic asswipe. This one critic put it best by articulating Thea’s biggest problem with the movie: “[Scott Pilgrim is] singularly fixated on…shallow visions of women as one-dimensional objects to be either obtained or discarded.”
YES. This. Knives deserved better. And let’s face it – in what universe would Ramona ever, EVER be with a guy like Scott – who has no personality, no life, ostensibly no money, and is not even the tiniest bit physically attractive?
Thea will say that the visuals and the editing were cool, and the secondary characters were awesome fun (Kieran Culkin, Chris Evans and Brandon Routh in particular) – but the whole story is ADD nonsense. And this is coming from someone that owns every major game console to have come out in the past 15 years – Thea LOVES video games. Thea is a huge geek. Thea is a part of the so-called target audience…and yet Scott Pilgrim felt gratuitous, stupid and, well, soulless.
And now Thea will retire because evidently EVERYONE IN THE UNIVERSE loved this movie.
5. LOST
Because really, what would this list be without the TV show that has consumed our lives for the past six years? We love LOST. We started The Book Smugglers because of LOST! We’ve spent countless hours theorizing, spoiler whoring, debating, and contemplating the overall meaning of the island, the losties, and HOW exactly The Powers That Be (TPTB) would be able to tie it all together.
And, dudes, it is with pain that we say that while we wouldn’t give up LOST for anything in the world and the final season earned spots on both of our Best of TV lists, the final season of the show was a hot mess.
First, we hated what they did to all the characters we’ve known and loved over the years. In particular, we hated what TPTB did to Locke. Ultimately, Locke’s fate was to die alone, hungry for approval and full of his desire to be “special” – but just to be used by Smokey as Locke was used his whole, sad life? There’s no doubt that Terry O’Quinn is one badass actor, and his role as FLocke/theLockeMonster was awesome – but in that awesomeness, it’s important not to forget that the character we fell in love with was the broken but determined man that wouldn’t let anyone tell him what he couldn’t do…only he was tossed aside like so much garbage.
We hated what TPTB did to Sayid, letting him fade into obscurity, and really never giving the poor dude a break (first with Shannon, then he’s with Nadia for a nanosecond before she’s killed). We hated what they did to poor Claire (just that terrible wig they made her wear for the duration of the final season is an egregious enough offense). We hated what they did to Sawyer and Juliet, who are both awesome characters on their own but were forced into a weird relationship because of the demands of the clinically insane Jater audeince. Of course, we hated the ongoing, sniveling, tear-filled saga of Jack and Kate (and we suppose Aaron too, because yes, Kate needs a baby, that’s the only way to redeem female characters on this show).
We hated the shift of attention from the BIG PICTURE to so much nonsense – the weird Temple of Doom with the fountain of life and the Japanese dude with the baseball and his herbs and shit, the decision to give Alpert a whole freaking episode devoted to the mystery of the Black Rock in the jungle *insert massive eye rolling*. We hated the decision to give us a Jacob and MIB (still an acronym because HIS NAME IS NEVER REVEALED) childhood episode with the weird mom from Juno, just to uncover the mystery of Adam and Eve (who OF COURSE are characters that we haven’t even met until this point) and the magical light of the island (which we’ve NEVER seen nor heard of prior to this episode but is apparently TEH BIG SEKRIT OF TEH ISLAND) and is the light of good inside of every man *gags*
It became very, very clear that at this point, the writers were literally pulling storylines and “answers” out of their asses. And it did NOT smell pretty, dudes.
Most of all, we hated the way things were boiled down to the most simplistic elements – because at the end of the day, it turns out that LOST was really just about “GOOD” versus “EVIL” and WHITE versus BLACK with fucking crappy religious overtones and THEY WERE ALL DEAD AND THIS SHIT IS PATHETIC. All the mythology? All the electromagnetism and Dharma and Hanso and Time Travel and Healing Properties…
It. All. Meant. Nothing.
We would never give up the show, and we still finished the series with joy – but there was a lot of bitterness, too. We wouldn’t trade LOST for anything, but we can’t help but point out that the show’s final season – and the show’s ultimate “explanation” – had a lot of really big problems.
And that’s it! Our 2010 grievances are aired, and our 2011 slates are clean. Are there any gripes y’all have had for the past year that you want to get off your chest?






































100% agree about posts on “how to blog” or arguments about blogging and what bloggers should do. There have been way too many arguments and posts and dramas about various “issues” this past year. Yes, definitely, people should do their own thing and worry less about what everyone else is doing – and stop getting offended by a comment someone else made.
Also agreed about Lost – I did not like the last season very much at all. In fact, it’s made me like the series as a whole a lot less (but then I didn’t like the first season, either, just the middle seasons so I’m certainly not its biggest fan or anything).
I haven’t seen/read the rest to agree or disagree.
Due to all the ‘meh’ reviews about Matched, I haven’t picked it up yet.
So this is going to sound horrible but I started laughing at around the second paragraph of Skippy Dies because I could just tell it was NOT going to be funny. And it’s so awful that it was advertised as a comedy that I just cracked up.
I so so agree wtih overhyped books and the posts on HOW TO (BOOK)BLOG. Oh my goodness those posts irritate me to no end. It’s not that hard and blogging is supposed to be what you make of it or whatever. Just do whatever floats your boat within reason, just act like you have some home training. Stop getting mad at people who write short reviews or really long reviews or get a lot of ARCS, etc. Whew. I just got a grievance off my chest
RE: Lost
OK, I must defend my beloved Sawyer and Juliet. As a hardcore Kate-Sawyer shipper from the very beginning, I was very skeptical about that pairing, but it totally worked for me. Their reunion scene was hands down my favorite part of the finale.
But I agree with you one pretty much everything else. One of my biggest gripes was Jack’s characterization. While it was an ensemble drama, Jack was, to a certain extent, the POV character. Which is kind of a big deal. He started off the show feeling like he had to save everybody and then spent six seasons learning that… he was supposed to save everybody. How is that character growth? What was the point of *anything* that happened to him during the series? Frustrating.
LOVED THIS POST. Loved the Double Facepalm picture, the overhyped books thing, the “litt-ruh-chah” snobs.
Hahha, I agree with you. With all the hype about Matched, I thought it was released months ago. I guess most bloggers wants to be cool because they review a book that not yet out there?
And also about HOW TO BLOG. Seriously? double facepalm. Who the fudge are you telling people how to blog? Its like telling people how to right their diaries. major big fails. Perhaps some of them wants to help because they got tired being asked the same question over and over again about ‘tips’ to blog. In my opinion, write what you want!!! You want to write a review for bad book, do it! You don’t want to put pictures on your blog, do it! It’s yours! The worse thing could happened is some people might stop reading your blog, but I think it worth the pleasure of writing things that you like instead of feeling forced to write according to what the ‘expert’ said.
Thanks for allowing me to rant. And yeah, I think you read the wrong Murakami, try Norwegian Wood
OMG YES. About Scott Pilgrim! YES. Yes. YES. I hated that movie. And I have never fully articulated why. And you just did for me. Thank you. Also, Skippy Dies sounds horrible. I love genre fic and lit fic, but I dislike the hatred that often comes from lit fic readers for genre readers (and sometimes vice versa). I have to agree that I liked Sawyer and Juliet together. I also think I feel the same way about the ending of lost. It just wasn’t satisfying. And that makes me sad
That anonymous comment at 7:22 is me!
I loved what you said about lost. I bought my son a shirt that said I watched lost for 6 years and all I got was a lousy ending. It was my apology for making him watch it with me.He kept saying that was how it was going to end. I kept saying that they wouldn’t have spent all that time and effort just to have that terrible an ending.
Booksmugglers, you are in my head, airing my grievances. Guidance posts on how-to-blog are ok, if overabundant, given the crop of new bloggers that sprouts up daily being all, How do I do this. It’s the Thou Shalts and Thou Shalt Nots that keeeeel me. I read one that was all YOU MUST RESPOND TO EVERY COMMENT ON YOUR BLOG and then also you should probably visit every commenter’s blog and leave a comment on THEIR blog and if someone follows you you should follow them back because it’s common courtesy and HOLY SHIT WHO HAS THAT KIND OF TIME? And doesn’t following people who follow you make your list of people you follow into (essentially) a list of people who follow you and what the hell point is there in that and HULK SMASH! Do not tell me how I can and cannot blog. This is my sandbox.
Phew. *wipes forehead* I appear to have exorcised some demons. Keep calm and carry on.
I know I hardly ever post, but…I love you guys! *hugs*
And I am never, ever, EVER going to read Skippy Dies!
Oh, and if this helped – I have never heard of Matched
And no, I’m not joking
That post was worlds of awesome. Thanks.
Just one thought on LOST (too many hours of my life already spent ranting…) – i could have forgiven all of the last season’s foibles (yes, even the literal plug in the island) if not for the last five minutes of the final episode. They walked into that church – and all that that implied – and they lost me. No pun intended. What a waste of a parallel reality. And what about Jack’s placeholder son – is he just stuck in purgatory limbo forever while everone else moves on? He was just there to fill time? Urgh. *deep breath*
The entire post was hilarious. Loved it.
The only thing I can comment on is your LOST grievance. You covered all the bases your lines of
was right on point.
Not sure how I feel about hanging in there all that time. As much as I enjoyed it along the way midway through season 6 I felt cheated. Knew I wasn’t going to get answers but watched anyway. I don’t just conflicted, obviously
Excellent way to end 2010 and begin 2011 gals!!!!
I think that the person who wrote the article disparaging genre writing was out of line, because writing in itself is hard, regardless of the genre. What bothered me most about his smug stance on literary fiction is that he believes somehow that lit fiction is “better”, but history has shown us that it is not necessarily so. A story like “Gone With The Wind” could easily be considered genre. In fact Jane Austen herself was disregarded as just a woman writer, writing simple novels for women and fulfilling women’s fantasies about romance and such. I’m sure this Edward Docx wouldn’t consider Austen just another badly written genre writer. Another example: Frankenstein. When Mary Shelley wrote it, again, it was a serialized novel, popular, which today we would consider genre, yet, it is considered literature, it is read in many literature classrooms and it is indeed considered the parent of all sci-fi literature. The Moonstone, considered the first mystery in the genre, is studied in many 19th Century literature classrooms, and it is considered as much a classic as Jude The Obscure or anything written by DH Lawrence. What makes this Docx think that genre writing is not good writing? Or that it is easily written and formulaic? Thrillers especially, and good thrillers, take imagination, lots of it. God knows there are thrillers that fall flat, even if they follow a formula. Just like literary fiction, genre writing can be good or bad. Most of it bad, sure. But so is literary fiction, which is why being a successful writer is for the most of us but a dream. What makes me the most angry is that Docx dismisses all genre lit as irrelevant. I beg to differ.
Love the rant and the liberal use of donkey balls. I am also a big fan of Hot Fuzz but Scott Pilgrim.. not so much.
[...] Smugglivus 2010: Airing of Grievances: We have seen myriad posts about Blogging Rules around the Internets last year and we tried to stay [...]
Nice rant. I love rants.
I felt the same about ‘Lost.’ Right before the final season started I got Netflix — literally went and subscribed to Netflix when I found out all the seasons were available — and sat through every. single. episode. so I could “get” the final season (cause I’d missed quite a bit overall). Come to find out, I did it all for nothing. The whole show was like a water slide… we’re in a raft going around sharp turns, taking small dips and just waiting to be dumped into the water, only to land on grass. Wow, that analogy there…
I disagree about Scott Pilgrim, though. I thought it had great actors, nice comedy, a cool soundtrack, and awesome visual effects. Michael Cera definitely isn’t hot by many people’s standards, but I don’t think Scott Pilgrim is supposed to be hot. All the gripes people have with the movie seem to be A. The fact that it’s Michael Cera and B. that Scott is a toolbox, which he is; but that’s not a movie flaw, that’s kind of the point. I read the comics and the movie pretty much covered it.
I enjoy Michael Cera but agree completely on the film Scott Pilgrim; that movie sucked big donkey balls b/c it tried to hard and the Scott character was an @sshat. But I loved his roommate,lol
K. Culkin did great. ps, I havent heard anyone outside my bf say big donkey balls in so long!hahaha luv it
Love your thoughts…but I loved Matched…but I loved Halo, too and tons of people didn’t.
It really shouldn’t, but it makes me a happy bunny to see that my suspicions about the “Lost” writers claim that the whole story already stands weren’t unfounded.
They had no clue what they where doing… btw. did they ever bother to explain the Polar Bear?
The DVDs have an added 11 minutes that gives explicit answers to major questions.