Austenmania! Book Review: According to Jane by Marilyn Brant
It’s Austenmania! Today we do a little homage to the queen of Historical Romance herself, the indomitable Jane Austen. With a twist – both books we are reviewing take Jane Austen in the modern era, either in spirit (literally), or in form…
Title: According to Jane
Author:Marilyn Brant
Genre: Contemporary, Literature, Chick Lit, Romance
Publisher: Kensington
Publication Date: October 2009
Trade Paperback: 352 pages
Stand alone or series: Stand alone novel
How did I get this book: ARC (from the Author)
Why did I read this book: When author Marilyn Brant offered us a copy of her new novel and cited favorites like The Jane Austen Book Club and Lost in Austen as inspirations, I simply could not refuse. Though it’s different from my usual fare, I was very excited for a change of pace.
Summary: (from amazon.com)
It begins one day in sophomore English class, just as Ellie Barnett’s teacher is assigning Jane Austen’s “Pride and Prejudice”. From nowhere comes a quiet ‘tsk’ of displeasure. The target: Sam Blaine, the cute bad boy who’s teasing Ellie mercilessly, just as he has since kindergarten. Entirely unbidden, as Jane might say, the author’s ghost has taken up residence in Ellie’s mind, and seems determined to stay there. Jane’s wise and witty advice guides Ellie through the hell of adolescence and beyond, serving as the voice she trusts, usually far more than her own. Years and boyfriends come and go – sometimes a little too quickly, sometimes not nearly fast enough. But Jane’s counsel is constant, and on the subject of Sam, quite insistent. Stay away, Jane demands. He is your Mr. Wickham. Still, everyone has something to learn about love – perhaps even Jane herself. And lately, the voice in Ellie’s head is being drowned out by another, urging her to look beyond everything she thought she knew and seek out her very own, very unexpected, happy ending.
Review:
The time is the 1980s; the location, English class. While Ellie Barnett tries (and fails) to ignore the flirtatious teasings of the gorgeous and popular Sam Blaine – who has been the bane of her existence since kindergarten as a gift from the alphabetical seating gods – her teacher passes out the next assignment: Pride and Prejudice by Jane Austen. And then, Ellie hears the voice.
Beware, Ellie…Sam Blaine is your Mr. Wickham.
Ellie has just gained a new mentor and dear friend – the ghostly voice of Jane Austen has taken up in Ellie’s mind. Over the years, Ellie searches fruitlessly for love, always with the memory of Sam Blaine in her mind, and with Jane’s advice to guide her (when she chooses to listen to it). After a string of bad relationships, of near happiness, successes and failures, Ellie struggles to make peace not only with Jane, but with her own future.
According to Jane is something of a mixed bag for me. There were elements of the story that I loved, and even with my reservations, I must admit that According to Jane is a bittersweet, entertaining book. So far as plotting is concerned (with the exception of the ending) According to Jane is a finely written piece. I loved the at times brutal, at times realistic look at the relationships that Ms. Brant casts Ellie in. I loved how the timeline would alternate from the present to memories as Ellie goes through life in the twenty or so years following her graduation. The high school storyline in particular, where Ellie’s relationships and expectations of love all begin, is the most compelling of these memories. Of the other storylines, I loved the charged, evolving relationship between Ellie and her sister Di as the both mature into people very different from their high school personalities. I also loved the voice and concept of Jane Austen herself, speaking in Ellie’s head. It’s quirky – not to mention risky, as who’s to say Ellie isn’t a complete crackpot psychopath? – but it works. Ms. Brant captures a lively, witty tone for Jane Austen’s invisible ghost, and pulls off this technique with aplomb.
Furthermore, I loved the juxtaposition of Miss Austen’s 19th century sensibilities in Ellie’s 20th/21st century world. At times (particularly in one scene involving a Victoria’s Secret bra in the locker room) Jane Austen’s ghost would provide some much needed levity, and I found myself delighted. Also, there’s Ellie herself – her inner narrative, reflective, open and honest is at times heartbreaking, and at other hilarious. I loved her “types of guys” list, in particular – every woman has dated or been attracted to at least one of the types on that list.
But then, there were aspects of the book I was not crazy about. I don’t often read Chick Lit; not because I have some stigma against the genre – I have read and loved some books under this umbrella. But there are many books and films that fall into this category that drive me completely insane. For example, I don’t like movies such as He’s Just Not That Into You or Bride Wars. The reason for this distaste is the same reason that I found myself infuriated and fed up with Ellie in this particular novel:
I abhor the stereotype where women are portrayed as marriage-crazed, baby-craving monsters.
I despise this with every fiber of my being. Do these women actually exist? And if they do, are they actually in the MAJORITY of the female population? This concept is bizarre and alien to me – perhaps I am of a different generation, with different ambitions and values. Perhaps I’m a weirdo and totally out of touch with my sex. But the point is, characters like Ellie make me want to tear out clumps of my hair and gouge out my eyeballs with my fingernails and scream myself bloody hoarse.
Ellie’s life seems so wasted, because she’s consumed for twenty-plus years with this SOLE, self-defining desire to be a wife and mommy. It’s not so much that she’s looking for true love, but the fact that she NEEDS TO BE MARRIED NOW NOW NOW! EVERYONE ELSE IS MARRIED WHY AM I ALONE!?!!! She jumps from relationship to relationship looking for that one and only end game, even when the man is clearly wrong for her, even when she knows she does not love the person she is with. There is so much pain and heartache in this book, merely because Ellie is so warped in her preconceived notions of what a “happy ending” entails. And I’ll say it again, it seems like such a phenomenal waste of time – if Ellie focused her life on being comfortable with herself and not pegging her self worth on becoming a wife and popping out babies, she might have been a much happier woman. Ellie’s lack of common sense, her inability to define herself as a person outside of a relationship is, frankly, pathetic. To some extent this was Ms. Brant’s plan with the book (to show that Ellie was so set on marriage, she was becoming Charlotte Lucas)…but the way According to Jane ended negates this message completely (it negates any other contrary message the novel would have had to send about women being obsessed with marriage for all the wrong reasons).
Don’t get me wrong – I’m glad that Ellie finally gets her happy ending, as far-fetched as it may seem, and I did finish the book with a smile. To be fair, my misgivings with According to Jane are not so much to do with Ms. Brant’s writing or plotting skills, both of which are solid. My gripe has to do with the stereotype, and expectations of female behavior in general.
And…I can’t shake that sinking feeling that According to Jane is just another example of this Crazy Marriage/Mommy Lady stereotype being perpetuated. These modern heroines (not just Ellie, but the aforementioned crazy chicks – because they are ALWAYS portrayed as scary-crazy-obsessed – from marriage-obsessed chick flicks) are completely back-asswards. They go against everything Jane Austen stood for! They lack Lizzie Bennet’s good sense, just as they lack her ability to become a strong, confident woman without needing someone else (read: a man) to make them feel that way. They lack her ability to define herself OUTSIDE of the roles of matrimony and children.
Isn’t that what Jane Austen’s most beloved heroine was all about?
Notable Quotes/Parts: From Ms. Brant’s website:
I watched the taillights of Dominic’s Pontiac fade away into the distance, and I thought about our deteriorating relationship. Who I was. Who he was. Where we were going. Or not going. I’d almost broken up with him an hour before, but I’d held on. Why, why, why?
Perhaps it is because you feel lonely? Jane suggested.
Yeah.
And because you are about to embark on something unknown next month–your graduate studies at a new university–and you crave the familiar?
Yeah. That, too.
And, additionally, because you will be two-and-twenty next week and wish to celebrate it with someone dear to you?
I didn’t speak, but I nodded. I should’ve known Jane Austen would figure it out. She’d been my constant companion, my most secret friend for years. She spoke only in the silence of my mind, but she knew me as no one else could…or wanted to.
All will turn out right, Ellie, she said softly. Trust in yourself and in your instincts. You have a strong intuition about the honor and character of others. It is stronger, perhaps, than you realize, and it gains further strength with time and experience. Do not despair.
Thanks, Jane, I whispered, fighting back the despair that curled in my stomach nevertheless.
You can read the full excerpt online at Ms. Brant’s website HERE.
(And on the same rant as above – SEE!? Ellie is 22 years old. 22. And she’s already freaking out about marriage and babies at this point.)
Additional Thoughts:
While we’re in the Austen mood, I’d like to second Ana’s earlier recommendation of Lost in Austen (a BBC miniseries that is available in the USA now on DVD). It takes extreme liberty with Jane Austen’s Pride and Prejudice, and yet…it completely and totally works! It’s hilarious, smart, and, of course, romantic in all the right ways.
Another highly recommended flick (and book) is The Jane Austen Book Club. I never would have given this movie a shot if it weren’t for the urgings of the boyfriend (SHH!!!), but it is truly fabulous. Heartstring-tugging, refreshingly romantic in a way that isn’t condescending, and realistic. I loved it and highly recommend it.
And here are the clips to prove it! First, a deleted scene from Lost in Austen – in which Miss Amanda Price sings:
And second, scifi geek Grigg and control freak Joscelyn’s first meeting from The Jane Austen Book Club:
Verdict: According to Jane has many strengths, and is a solid debut effort from Ms. Brant. Unfortunately, I wasn’t able to fully enjoy this book with reckless abandon because of my own personal reading and character prejudices – but I do recommend that everyone try this novel out for themselves. Fans of Austen, and of romantic writing of the chick lit persuasion (who perhaps don’t feel so passionately about the crazy marriage lady stereotype) will not be disappointed with this alternately whimsical and serious book about growing up and finding a happily ever after. It simply was not for me.
Rating: 6 – Good, Recommend With Reservations
Reading Next: Heart’s Blood by Juliet Marillier
7 Responses to Austenmania! Book Review: According to Jane by Marilyn Brant
Leave a Reply Cancel reply
About Us
We are two completely obsessed, sad, sick addicts when it comes to books. Faced with threats and cynicisms from our significant others and because of the massive amounts of time and money we spend at Amazon.com, we resorted to getting books delivered to our offices and then smuggling them into our homes (in huge handbags) to avoid detection. Here we found a perfect outlet for our obsession! Reviews, recommendations, and other ponderings are our specialty.Sponsors
Subscribe
Subscribe to The Newsletter
Book Smuggler Specialties
We do at least two of these conversational-style joint reviews a monthInterviews with authors whose books we have reviewedAuthors whose books we have reviewed talk about their writing inspirations and influencesReviews of books that have made it to the big screenMonthly feature in which we "dare" guest reviewers to read & review books outside of their comfort zonesFeature in which each Smuggler reads and reviews a book that the other has already reviewedWeekly feature in which each Smuggler discloses upcoming titles they cannot wait to readFeature in which we ask the often controversial question: Do Covers Matter?Tags
Adventure Apocalypse Blog Tour Comedy Comics Contemporary Covers Dark Fantasy Dystopia Fairy Tales Fantasy Graphic Novel Guest Post Halloween Historical Horror Kim Harrison LGBT Literary Fiction Lost Meljean Brook Middle Grade Movie Review Movies Mystery Nalini Singh Neil Gaiman Paranormal Paranormal Romance PoC Retelling Richelle Mead Romance Science Fiction Smugglivus Smugglivus 2010 Smugglivus 2011 Speculative Fiction Steampunk Thriller TV Shows Urban Fantasy Vampire Young Adult ZombiesFTC Disclaimer
In accordance with the new FTC Guidelines for blogging and endorsements, The Book Smugglers would like everyone to know that while we do purchase our own books for review on occasion, you should assume that every book reviewed here at The Book Smugglers was provided to the reviewers by the publisher or the author for free unless specified otherwise.
Archives
- ► 2012
- May 2012 (33)
- April 2012 (36)
- March 2012 (37)
- February 2012 (39)
- January 2012 (42)
- ► 2011
- December 2011 (76)
- November 2011 (36)
- October 2011 (47)
- September 2011 (36)
- August 2011 (37)
- July 2011 (35)
- June 2011 (37)
- May 2011 (34)
- April 2011 (33)
- March 2011 (31)
- February 2011 (28)
- January 2011 (36)
- ► 2010
- December 2010 (71)
- November 2010 (33)
- October 2010 (38)
- September 2010 (38)
- August 2010 (36)
- July 2010 (37)
- June 2010 (34)
- May 2010 (39)
- April 2010 (49)
- March 2010 (46)
- February 2010 (38)
- January 2010 (44)
- ► 2009
- December 2009 (67)
- November 2009 (45)
- October 2009 (63)
- September 2009 (49)
- August 2009 (51)
- July 2009 (43)
- June 2009 (30)
- May 2009 (41)
- April 2009 (34)
- March 2009 (36)
- February 2009 (39)
- January 2009 (40)
- ► 2008
- December 2008 (63)
- November 2008 (33)
- October 2008 (51)
- September 2008 (40)
- August 2008 (35)
- July 2008 (42)
- June 2008 (36)
- May 2008 (37)
- April 2008 (37)
- March 2008 (34)
- February 2008 (34)
- January 2008 (31)
- ► 2012
Rating System
10 One of the best books I have ever read9 Damn near perfection8 Excellent7 Very good6 Good, recommend with reservations5 Meh, take it or leave it4 Bad, but not without some merit3 Horrible, barely readable2 Complete waste of time1 One of the worst books I have ever read; I want my money (and a few hours of my life) back0 Did not finish


















Thanks for the review! I see a ton of these books related to Austen (who I adore) and afraid they are going to be terrible. Jane Austen Book Club was a great book and the movie was well done. I have also noticed that trend that we are all crazy, marriage/money hungry, bio-clock ticking woman-what gives?
Those women do exist. My good friend (who’s 23), is determined to be engaged by next year, and married with kids by the time she’s 26. She thinks anyone not like this (including me) is “wierd” and in the minority.
The book sounds interesting, and I’ll probably give it a try at some point. I also fully agree with you about The Jane Austin Book Club; I ended up watching it by accident and loved it
They definitely exist, as Cait said. I’ve known several. Not understood them, per se, but known them.
Ah, I love The Jane Austen Book Club movie. Just love it. The book is quite good as well. So at least there’s one modern Austen take that’s good.
I saw the first part of LOST IN AUSTEN (loved it) but missed the second part. I keep hoping it’ll play once more on TV, but it hasn’t.
“The Jane Austen Book Club” is my fave among recent years romances, a movie about book lovers and with a sci-fi geek no less, what more can you ask for (the highly charismatic and talented cast of actors didn’t hurt either), this the first time though I see somebody mentioning the book in a positve light.
I don’t think I heard of “Lost in Austen” before. Have to have a look around for that.
Ouch. Perhaps I am too old to post/be part of this group… I am one of “those women,” having just been married for the first time at 37. I understood the article when you mentioned the age – 22 is extremely young to be focused on marriage – but for myself at the time (two years after graduation, I was in 3 weddings), I just wanted a good relationship. And once you “give it up” it’s terribly hard to turn around and end a relationship. (Not everyone is so liberated that they can internalize the intellectual knowledge you aren’t a woman of ill repute..) Part of the mix of Catholic/religious guilt, part of wanting to have what everyone else seems to have, part of fear of being alone *for*ev*er…
I’m not sure that wishing for marriage from a young age, wanting family makes you crazy. Course I haven’t read this or many other Austen-inspired books, either. While this kind of heroine does not reflect Jane or her writing, one of the reasons she has such adoring fans is because we admire women who are so independent. No matter how independent some of us are, there is often a quiet desperation as we trudge out there on our own, making our own way.
Also, the baby fever is even more real now, because it’s a scientific fact that if you want your own child, and not from deep freeze, you only have so long to make it happen. The statistics are chilling, especially if you don’t have thousands to throw at the effort.
That said, I may read the book.
Just wanted to say, I watched The Jane Austen Book Club earlier this week, per your recommendation, and loved it. Blogged about it (and your fab rec!) here.
Thanks, Thea!