The Dare: Ana reads The Drawing of the Three by Stephen King
Title: The Drawing of the Three
Author: Stephen King
Genre: Fantasy/Horror

Publisher: New English Library
Publishing Date: New Edition – 2003
Paperback: 496 pages
Stand alone or series: book 2 in the Dark Tower series
Summary:Roland of Gilead, the Last Gunslinger, encounters three doors which open to 1980s America, where he joins forces with the defiant Eddie Dean and courageous, volatile Odetta Holmes. And confronts deadly serial killer Jack Mort.
As the titanic forces gather, a savage struggle between underworld evil and otherworldly enemies conspire to bring an end to Roland’s quest for the Dark Tower.
Why did I read the book: Thea dared me. Gaah.
Review:
Stephen King and I have a…complicated history. I have watched plently of movies based on his books but I had never actually read any of his novels. Then Thea made me read The Gunslinger, for our Western Appreciation Week last year, the opening of The Dark Tower, a seven-book series and I really did like it. I finished The Gunslinger and bought book 2, The Drawing of Three straight away but for a myriad of reasons I never actually got around to reading it.
Then, Thea asked me to read another Stephen King book for our Halloween celebration in 2008– It – which I had huge problems with (you can read about the It debacle here) and vowed, yes, I truly did vow never to read Stephen King again. But because I am a weak soul, and Thea is totally a miss bossypants, she actually dared me to read yet another one for our Smugglivus’ Feats of Strength. I then read The Talisman and well. It was a good book but it didn’t wow me. To that point, I could still not see the Stephen King allure.
The intro above is a disclaimer for you to understand my reaction when it was time for another dare and Thea asked me to read The Drawing of the Three. I actually groaned, then rolled my eyes, attempted to postpone the dare at least 4 times, but ultimately couldn’t get away with it (please refer to the miss bossypants part above). Now, here I am. And you know what? I take it back. Curse my feeble mind, I actually really liked The Drawing of the Three.
At the end of book one, our hero Roland of Gilead finally catches up with the Man in Black, the person he had been chasing forever in his search for the elusive, mysterious, Dark Tower. They have a parley and he learns that his Quest effectively starts now. The Man in Black, using a deck of Tarot cards, tells Roland that he will meet three people to join him in his journey and each of then is represented by a card: The Prisoner, The Lady of the Shadows and Death. This is what lies ahead of him and what The Drawing of the Three is all about.
Book 2 starts with a bang, only a few hours after the events at the end of The Gunslinger. The book opens with Roland being alone in a deserted beach and waking up to find that he is having his hands being chewed off by a Lobster Creature – a lobstrosity. He loses his index and middle fingers before he kills the thing. This is really, REALLY bad news because, as his title says he is a Gunslinger. The last one. He needs these fingers to shoot his gun! This means that he kicks-off the last leg of his life-time journey to find the Dark Tower with a deficiency. That my friends, is kick-ass right there.
But never mind, because like any and all good heroes, he carries on. NOTHING will keep him from finding the Dark Tower. The reason behind his journey is still very much a mystery. We still don’t know what drives him, why he wants to reach the Dark Tower so freaking much. It is clear that he will stop at nothing. In book 1, he let a kid, Jake, die. He sacrificed someone he cared for, for his feverish, obsessive pursuit. It was an agonising choice he made, but he made it nonetheless. He is still being haunted by this in The Drawing of the Three which is good – that gives Roland a more human side. That is not to say that he wouldn’t do it again. He would and I think he will. In any case, the sacrifice of Jake was necessary to open the doors from which he draws his three.
These doors, in a very surreal way, appear in the middle of the beach – the first one opens to a different dimension – to a new New York in the mid-eighties. As soon as he opens the door, Roland realises he is inside someone’s mind: that of young guy Eddie Dean, who is a Prisoner of his heroin addiction. After a series of events in dealing with Eddie’s problems with a Mafia boss, Roland draws his first comrade and brings him to his side of the door. Door two opens inside the mind of one Odetta Holmes , the Lady of Shadows, thus named for her dissociative identity disorder. She shares her mind, without knowing it, with a violent, alternate persona called Detta Walker. The third door opens to the mind of the serial killed The Pusher and this third door is what brings all the doors together.
Both Eddie and Odetta/Detta are great characters and Stephen King’s knack for characterisation is present in this series as well. This talent of his is probably what made me dislike It so much – because I adored the characters in that book and hated to see what was made of them. From Eddie’ struggles with his two additions, heroin and taking care of people. To Odetta cool demeanour and Detta’s craziness, each of these people are essential to Roland’s journey for many reasons. They are his companions and will probably help him out but at the heart of it, is the necessary humanisation of a hard-boiled character. His connection with the two characters shows that he is still very much able to love – even if he is willing to sacrifice them all for a greater purpose. He is The anti-hero. Plus, he spends the book, crippled, starving, nearly dying of infection and yet, he manages to capture your attention, to command and demand respect from his companions and from the reader. I am at Roland’s feet in the end, even if I am unable to understand what exactly, drives him.
My main gripe with the book, which is my main gripe with most of Stephen King’s works (expect for The Gunslinger which was short and to the point hence being my favourite so far), is that everything above, this whole story could have been condensed in a much shorter book – I believe that would make all the difference. Stephen King, I said that before and I repeat it here, is a word-waster. There were many, many parts completely irrelevant to the story, shifting point of views to en passant characters that appeared out of nowhere whom I did.not.care one iota. That dragged the book for me quite a lot in the middle (and I admit I skimmed!).
From the very trippy manner in which not only the doors appear and function to the surprising revelation of the final door (one word for you: Susannah), this book was a hell of a journey. There were highs and lows but when the third door opens, it opened up a whole new world to me. It was, for lack of a better word: fantastic. The third, final part of the book was completely, utterly remarkable and it was right then that I saw it. I saw how The Dark Tower is not only Thea’s favourite series of all time but also what is considered to be Stephen King’s Magnum Opus. I put the book down and immediately went online and bought book 3.
Notable Quotes/ parts: Roland’s endurance:
Very well. I am now a man with no food, with two less fingers and one less toe than I was born with; I am a gunslinger with shells which may not fire; I am sickening from a monster’s bite and have no medicine; I have a day’s water if I’m lucky; I may be able to walk perhaps, a dozen miles if I press myself to the last extremity. I am, in short, a man on the edge of everything.
Which was should he walk? He had come from the east; he could not walk west without the powers of a saint or a saviour. That left north and south.
North.
That was the answer his heart told. There was no question in it.
North.
The gunslinger began to walk.
Verdict: With these great characters, Stephen King has a solid band of brothers and sisters to tell his story. A bit uneven but still very good. I will definitely read the next one.
Rating: 7 – Very Good
Reading next: Tempt Me At Twilight by Lisa Kleypas
6 Responses to The Dare: Ana reads The Drawing of the Three by Stephen King
Leave a Reply Cancel reply
About Us
We are two completely obsessed, sad, sick addicts when it comes to books. Faced with threats and cynicisms from our significant others and because of the massive amounts of time and money we spend at Amazon.com, we resorted to getting books delivered to our offices and then smuggling them into our homes (in huge handbags) to avoid detection. Here we found a perfect outlet for our obsession! Reviews, recommendations, and other ponderings are our specialty.Sponsors
Subscribe
Subscribe to The Newsletter
Book Smuggler Specialties
We do at least two of these conversational-style joint reviews a monthInterviews with authors whose books we have reviewedAuthors whose books we have reviewed talk about their writing inspirations and influencesReviews of books that have made it to the big screenMonthly feature in which we "dare" guest reviewers to read & review books outside of their comfort zonesFeature in which each Smuggler reads and reviews a book that the other has already reviewedWeekly feature in which each Smuggler discloses upcoming titles they cannot wait to readFeature in which we ask the often controversial question: Do Covers Matter?Tags
Adventure Apocalypse Blog Tour Comedy Comics Contemporary Covers Dark Fantasy Dystopia Fairy Tales Fantasy Graphic Novel Guest Post Halloween Historical Horror Kim Harrison LGBT Literary Fiction Lost Meljean Brook Middle Grade Movie Review Movies Mystery Nalini Singh Neil Gaiman Paranormal Paranormal Romance PoC Retelling Richelle Mead Romance Science Fiction Smugglivus Smugglivus 2010 Smugglivus 2011 Speculative Fiction Steampunk Thriller TV Shows Urban Fantasy Vampire Young Adult ZombiesFTC Disclaimer
In accordance with the new FTC Guidelines for blogging and endorsements, The Book Smugglers would like everyone to know that while we do purchase our own books for review on occasion, you should assume that every book reviewed here at The Book Smugglers was provided to the reviewers by the publisher or the author for free unless specified otherwise.
Archives
- ► 2012
- May 2012 (33)
- April 2012 (36)
- March 2012 (37)
- February 2012 (39)
- January 2012 (42)
- ► 2011
- December 2011 (76)
- November 2011 (36)
- October 2011 (47)
- September 2011 (36)
- August 2011 (37)
- July 2011 (35)
- June 2011 (37)
- May 2011 (34)
- April 2011 (33)
- March 2011 (31)
- February 2011 (28)
- January 2011 (36)
- ► 2010
- December 2010 (71)
- November 2010 (33)
- October 2010 (38)
- September 2010 (38)
- August 2010 (36)
- July 2010 (37)
- June 2010 (34)
- May 2010 (39)
- April 2010 (49)
- March 2010 (46)
- February 2010 (38)
- January 2010 (44)
- ► 2009
- December 2009 (67)
- November 2009 (45)
- October 2009 (63)
- September 2009 (49)
- August 2009 (51)
- July 2009 (43)
- June 2009 (30)
- May 2009 (41)
- April 2009 (34)
- March 2009 (36)
- February 2009 (39)
- January 2009 (40)
- ► 2008
- December 2008 (63)
- November 2008 (33)
- October 2008 (51)
- September 2008 (40)
- August 2008 (35)
- July 2008 (42)
- June 2008 (36)
- May 2008 (37)
- April 2008 (37)
- March 2008 (34)
- February 2008 (34)
- January 2008 (31)
- ► 2012
Rating System
10 One of the best books I have ever read9 Damn near perfection8 Excellent7 Very good6 Good, recommend with reservations5 Meh, take it or leave it4 Bad, but not without some merit3 Horrible, barely readable2 Complete waste of time1 One of the worst books I have ever read; I want my money (and a few hours of my life) back0 Did not finish















dod-a-chick? did-a-chuck? dad-a-cham?
Ahhh, Ana! SEE! I KNEW YOU’D LOVE THIS BOOK!!!!!!!!!!!
It’s not your “typical” SK – more dark fantasy than the straight-up horror. And isn’t it surreal and fantastic? I always tell people that you need to read The Gunslinger AND The Drawing of the Three in order to form a full opinion of the series initially. Just WAIT until you read The Wastelands – my favorite book of the series, for so many reasons. LOVE. These early books are fantastic. *melts* I CANNOT BELIEVE I FINALLY HAVE SOMEONE ELSE TO TALK TO ABOUT THESE!!! I know *NO ONE* in real life or online that has read them. Sigh.
I agree that Stephen King can be a bit hit and miss, ‘It’ and ‘The Tommyknockers’ spring immediately to mind as being pretty awful. However… one of the best post-apocalyptic novels ever (pre ‘The Road’) is ‘The Stand’ and he writes some amazing short stories, particularly his early stuff. He even does decent vampires! (see ‘Salem’s Lot’). I haven’t read much of his recent works but he has written some classics.
Firequeen
London, UK
I spent one very baffled afternoon with a film adaptation of The Langoliers. (Ten freaking hours!! I lasted possibly 1.75 hours.) I have never tried reading a King novel and really should. This sounds like a good ‘un but maybe I should start with Carrie or it…?
I remember reading The Gunslinger while at university…and enjoying it….but for some reason I never got any further… Not sure why
Hmmmm….. Perhaps I need to give The Gunslinger another go?
I adore this series. But, I also recognize it’s an acquired taste. If you think there are wasted words in the second book, wait until you get to the fourth.
[...] world “that has moved on”. The Waste Lands opens a few weeks after the AWESOME ending of The Drawing of Three when Roland is joined by two companions, Eddie and Susannah in his search for the Dark Tower. At [...]