From the Page to the Screen: The Ruins
Title: The Ruins
Novel by Scott Smith
Movie directed by Carter Smith; screenplay by Scott Smith; starring Jonathan Tucker, Jena Malone, Shawn Ashmore, and Laura Ramsey
The Ruins is only Scott Smith’s second book. His first novel, A Simple Plan, was a much ballyhooed work—and for good reason. Mr. Smith stormed on the literary scene with a successful, haunting tale of greed, paranoia and depravity back in 1993 with A Simple Plan, which was later adapted very successfully into a movie will the all-star cast of Bill Paxton, Holly Hunter and Billy Bob Thornton. After going over a decade with no new work, his 2006 novel The Ruins was long overdue, and perhaps received harsher criticism than it deserved.
The novel follows a group of twenty-somethings on an extended, post-undergraduate vacation in Mexico. Two American couples—Eric and Stacy, and Jeff and Amy—enjoy long days lounging by the pool and on the beach, drinking tons of tequila and cerveza, basically just being young, beautiful and free. They couples meet up with a German twenty-something, Mathias, and three crazy Greeks at the hotel. After hitting it off together, Mathias asks if the group wants to go on a day trip with him to meet with his MIA brother Heinrich, who has taken off to a dig site with his new archaeologist lover. At the urging of Jeff (med school bound after the vacation) to “get some culture”, the group agrees and they set off for the hidden ruins, armed only with a vague map left by Heinrich, a few snacks, and a bottle of tequila. The site is in the heart of a Yucatan rainforest, and very isolated—when they ask a taxi to take them to the place on the map, the driver remarks that it is a bad place (red flags should be going up here).
In any case, they make it. Hiking through the jungle, they uncover a hidden trail that leads to the site of the ruins—a large stone step pyramid covered in a tick, leafy vine and dotted by bright red flowers. A yellow tent flaps in the breeze at the top, and there is an excavation well dipping into the site…but no sign of the dig team, or Heinrich. Some local Mayans from a nearby village storm onto the scene, speaking in a dialect no one can understand, and brandishing guns and arrows. Amy, entranced, tries to capture the scene through the lens of her camera…she takes a step back…and another…and suddenly the yelling is even louder. The natives are incensed, and force the couples and Mathias back, to climb up the pyramid—making their point very clear by shooting the one Greek who made it out with them in the head.
What unfolds for the remaining survivors is terrifying. The Mayans won’t let the stranded tourists leave—and something very wrong is happening on the pyramid. This is not a happy tale, but how many horror stories are? With nothing but terror and death awaiting them, the worst qualities in each person surface. In his signature style, Mr. Smith captures these highly flawed, very human characters in a larger than life situation and lays bare what ugliness lurks in all of us, and what people will do when pushed to the edge of sanity.
The American tourists run into problems atop the ruins
From critic and user reviews around the web, The Ruins seems to have disappointed, garnering only a 66% fresh rating at Rotten Tomatoes and a miserable C+ rating at Yahoo.
I have to respectfully disagree with these negative reviews. The Ruins is, as Scott Smith wrote it, a horror story about humans. There is gore and there are some disturbing sequences (don’t want to spoil it, but I’ll thow out one example—the amputation of Mathais’ legs immediately comes to mind)—but this isn’t just some stupid, pretty-people-get-killed slasher flick. There is an elegance to the gore in this film—it doesn’t feel gratuitous for the sake of being gratuitous (*AHEM* Mr. Eli Roth and your complete lack of subtlety or style). Early in the movie there is some nudity, as you see the beautiful Stacy getting dressed—which initially seems superfluous…but later this image is contrasted sharply with the horrors she undergoes both physically and psychologically—and it is a lingering comparison.
Reading other reviews online, many writers site the “monster” as being stupid. To this I say, HOGWASH. The monster is original, and terrifying. One user review actually recommended the craptastic turdfest that was the 2006 film Turistas over this movie.
The Ruins is a rare find in a film genre that is increasingly cluttered with artless, soulless gorefests (Hostel) and hollow splatter franchises (The Saw legacy). Every actor in The Ruins gave an outstanding, believable performance. I felt the film was brilliantly cast taking younger, less known names with considerable talent and surprising experience—Jonathan Tucker (of The Virgin Suicides and Hostage), Jena Malone (Donnie Darko, Pride and Prejudice and most recently Into the Wild), Shawn Ashmore (from the X-Men movies), and with promising newcomer Laura Ramsey (who I loved in She’s the Man, also in Lords of Dogtown). Comparing this to the bland pretty actors from another recent horror release, Cloverfield, I cannot stress enough how overjoyed I am with the casting for this film.
(From R to L) Jonathan Tucker, Jena Malone, Laura Ramsey, and Shawn Ashmore give solid performances
I highly encourage everyone to see the movie. Yes—this is another rare instance where the film surpassed the book (in my opinion, of course)!
Rating:
Book: 8 Excellent
Movie: 10 Perfection. It is a rare treat indeed to find a horror film of this caliber. My first 10 of the year! You want something terrifying and original? Go watch this movie.
2 Responses to From the Page to the Screen: The Ruins
Leave a Reply Cancel reply
About Us
We are two completely obsessed, sad, sick addicts when it comes to books. Faced with threats and cynicisms from our significant others and because of the massive amounts of time and money we spend at Amazon.com, we resorted to getting books delivered to our offices and then smuggling them into our homes (in huge handbags) to avoid detection. Here we found a perfect outlet for our obsession! Reviews, recommendations, and other ponderings are our specialty.Sponsors
Subscribe
Subscribe to The Newsletter
Book Smuggler Specialties
We do at least two of these conversational-style joint reviews a monthInterviews with authors whose books we have reviewedAuthors whose books we have reviewed talk about their writing inspirations and influencesReviews of books that have made it to the big screenMonthly feature in which we "dare" guest reviewers to read & review books outside of their comfort zonesFeature in which each Smuggler reads and reviews a book that the other has already reviewedWeekly feature in which each Smuggler discloses upcoming titles they cannot wait to readFeature in which we ask the often controversial question: Do Covers Matter?FTC Disclaimer
In accordance with the new FTC Guidelines for blogging and endorsements, The Book Smugglers would like everyone to know that while we do purchase our own books for review on occasion, you should assume that every book reviewed here at The Book Smugglers was provided to the reviewers by the publisher or the author for free unless specified otherwise.
Archives
- ► 2012
- February 2012 (14)
- January 2012 (42)
- ► 2011
- December 2011 (76)
- November 2011 (36)
- October 2011 (47)
- September 2011 (36)
- August 2011 (37)
- July 2011 (35)
- June 2011 (37)
- May 2011 (34)
- April 2011 (33)
- March 2011 (31)
- February 2011 (28)
- January 2011 (36)
- ► 2010
- December 2010 (71)
- November 2010 (33)
- October 2010 (38)
- September 2010 (38)
- August 2010 (36)
- July 2010 (37)
- June 2010 (34)
- May 2010 (39)
- April 2010 (49)
- March 2010 (46)
- February 2010 (38)
- January 2010 (44)
- ► 2009
- December 2009 (67)
- November 2009 (45)
- October 2009 (63)
- September 2009 (49)
- August 2009 (51)
- July 2009 (43)
- June 2009 (30)
- May 2009 (41)
- April 2009 (33)
- March 2009 (36)
- February 2009 (39)
- January 2009 (40)
- ► 2008
- December 2008 (63)
- November 2008 (33)
- October 2008 (51)
- September 2008 (40)
- August 2008 (35)
- July 2008 (42)
- June 2008 (36)
- May 2008 (37)
- April 2008 (37)
- March 2008 (34)
- February 2008 (34)
- January 2008 (31)
- ► 2012
Tags
Adventure Apocalypse Blog Tour Comedy Comics Contemporary Covers Dark Fantasy Dystopia Fairy Tales Fantasy Graphic Novel Guest Post Halloween Historical Horror Kim Harrison LGBT Literary Fiction Lost Meljean Brook Middle Grade Movie Review Movies Mystery Nalini Singh Neil Gaiman Paranormal Paranormal Romance PoC Retelling Richelle Mead Romance Science Fiction Smugglivus Smugglivus 2010 Smugglivus 2011 Speculative Fiction Steampunk Thriller TV Shows Urban Fantasy Vampire Young Adult ZombiesRating System
10 One of the best books I have ever read9 Damn near perfection8 Excellent7 Very good6 Good, recommend with reservations5 Meh, take it or leave it4 Bad, but not without some merit3 Horrible, barely readable2 Complete waste of time1 One of the worst books I have ever read; I want my money (and a few hours of my life) back0 Did not finish




















I was wondering if this movie was based off the book. The book cover is memorable and I recalled it from when I worked at the public library. I was going to look it up, but now I know.
Great review. I’ll definitely have to catch this movie. I love horror movies but I have to agree with the pathetic horror movies out now-a-days. Most recently The Hills Have Eyes franchise which I hate if for no other reason than the gratuitous rape scenes.Guh.
Then I watched The Hitcher the other day on HBO on Demand. I really thought the look of the movie was amazing but I kept waiting for some explanation as to why this guy was the way he was. The complete lack of any explanation just had me thinking…MEH. I know that sometimes nutjobs are just that….nuts and there is no rhyme or reason behind their actions but I felt that the movie was just lacking. I think an explanation of why The Hitcher was the way he was would have helped the movie as a whole.
But I digress. I’ll have to try and talk one of my friends into seeing the movie.
By the way I LOVE this Book/Movie comparison. I did one post on it awhile back but nothing as in depth and detailed as ya’ll’s. Lubs it.
Thanks Mollie! *blushes*
I am a bit of a sucker when it comes to horror movies–I will watch anything. ANYTHING. And I am pretty forgiving too. I agree that The Hills Have Eyes is a tough one to stomach–but despite that I have to admit that I have admiration for Alexadre Aja (the director) and how..unflinching his films are (well, to be fair I’ve only seen his THHE and High Tension). I even saw THHE 2, which was a complete waste of time (HBO On Demand FTW! :p ).
Then there are the Hostel movies and the Saw movies that are completely devoid of any style or substance, and how these enterprises can churn out the same goreporn year after year…well, it’s disappointing.
The Hitcher! Hee. I saw that one on cable as well. A fun mindless kind of thriller, and I totally get where you are coming from on wanting a bit more explanation.
Definitely, go check out The Ruins! There’s something about the simple, brutal honesty of Scott Smith’s work (both in writing, and translated on screen) that wins you over.
But be warned–the film IS gory. But in a way that makes sense…if that makes any sense? It creeps; it lingers.
Ok, I think I’ll stop blabbing now.